Sportcheck: Faster, stronger? Not for much longer

Florence Griffith-Joyner’s women’s 100 m World record of 10.49 seconds remains unchallenged to this day.
Florence Griffith-Joyner’s women’s 100 m World record of 10.49 seconds remains unchallenged to this day.


PARIS: Athletes are so close to reaching the absolute limits of the human body that just 20 years from now, dramatic improvement in world records can be ruled out in half of the classic disciplines, French scientists report.

Experts from France’s Institute for Biomedical and Epidemiological Research in Sport (IRMES) trawled through 3,263 world records in track and field, swimming, cycling, speed skating and weightlifting.The records spanned from 1896, when the modern Olympics was revived and accurate timekeeping began, to 2007.From 1896 to 1968 — excluding the two World Wars, when real international competition was impossible — world records were frequently and substantially smashed.Thereafter, the pace of record-breaking slowed and, in some cases, stopped completely. For instance, Florence Griffith-Joyner’s 10.49 seconds for the women’s 100 metres, set in 1988, remains unchallenged to this day.
In 2007, records were at 99 percent of human physical limits, according to the scientists’ statistical model.The trend was confirmed across a full range of physical exertions, regardless of whether the activity was aerobic (such as the 10,000m speed skating), anaerobic (weightlifting), used lower limbs (cycling) or upper limbs (shot put), explosive (high jump) or endurance (50km walk).By 2027, athletes will have reached 99.95 percent of physical limits, meaning that “half of the world’s records will not improve significantly,” the scientists believe.For example, the men’s 100m record of 9.67 seconds will only be improved by tiny slivers of time, measured in the thousands of seconds.And by 2060, the phenomenon will have spread to all of those disciplines, predicted lead researcher Jean-Francois Toussaint.“By 2060, assuming that conditions do not change markedly, we will have hit a ceiling, and a new record will typically be an improvement of one two-thousandth over the previous one,” he said in an interview last November.“It means we can change the unit of measurement to take this into account, for instance using thousandths of a second for the 100m, hundredths of a second for the marathon, or grammes for weightlifting – but then we might have to wait for half a century for the record to be broken.”Toussaint’s study admits that the statistical model may have been distorted by doping. In the 1980s, for instance, Soviet bloc athletes were notorious for use of steroids and other chemicals.But, the authors argue, this phenomenon proves the point about how close we are to human limits.Over the past 40 years, the science of training and diet and the social and economic resources devoted to top-level sport have all improved hugely, yet record busting has slowed. Without performance-enhancing drugs, the buffers would have been hit even earlier.“A fundamental question arises from this,” said Toussaint. “How do we see the future of sports that depend crucially on record-breaking? How can we, in the light of this, develop a new policy on sports?”The study appears in the open-access journal PLoS One, published by the US-based Public Library of Science (PLoS). — AFP

~ by missjewelz on February 9, 2008.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: